Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 3, 1921No. Nos. 24337, 24338PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Second District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge; H. E. Brunot, Judge. Mandamus proceedings by Henry O. Hollander and Thomas G. Moran against James J. Bailey, Secretary of State. Erom judgments for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rejecting his demand for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to have his name printed on the. official ballot, as a candidate for the office of judge ot' the Eirst recorder’s court 1 for the city of New Orleans. The secretary of state refused to have the name of any candidate for that office printed on the official ballot, because section 21 of the charter of the city of New Orleans (Act 159 of 1912, p. 270, as amended by Act 122 of 1914, p. 234) provides that the judges of the recorders’ courts shall be elected or chosen by the commission…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pettingill v. Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Wood v. BatemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Murchie v. BathIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gouaux v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Succession of BibbinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API