Legal Opinion

Gouaux v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 4, 1926No. 25724PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

The question in this ease is whether the Legislature was forbidden, either by the statute calling the constitutional convention of 1921, or by the schedule of the Constitution itself, to enact a law that would shorten the terms of .office of the parish health officers.

The statute by which the Legislature called the convention was the Act 180 of 1920. It contained (in the fourth paragraph of the first section) several restrictions or limitations upon the authority of the convention. Among those restrictions was a proviso forbidding the convention to enact or adopt any article or provision…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisk v. Jefferson Police JurySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State ex rel. Romain v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  3. Hollander v. BaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davenport v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API