Legal Opinion
Lavender v. Zurich Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 15, 1964No. 40777PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
The amendment to Code Ann. § 114-106 (Ga. L. 1963, pp. 141, 142), which provides that where there is a bona fide dispute as to the facts a settlement between the pa-ties giving due regard to conflicting evidence shall be approved by the board, is not involved here since the award was entered in 1962. It is therefore unnecessary to decide (a) whether this section relates to situations where there is a stipulation to the effect that the claimant is not entitled in any amount, or (b) whether, if so, this stipulation would be inadequate for the purpose because it does not recite…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Manry v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- McCord v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cline v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Black v. American & Foreign InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- HALL & SOSEBEE TRUCKING COMPANY, INC. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Dawson v. Atlanta Processing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Winnersville Roofing Co. v. CoddingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.