Mielke v. Daly Ditches Irrigation District
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
THE HON. HENRY C. LOBLE,
District Judge, sitting for MR. JUSTICE HARRISON, dissenting:
I respectfully dissent.
The District Court entered judgment in favor of the Mielkes, on the basis of adverse use, granting them 93 [sic] miner’s inches as a first priority right in Gird Creek. Our review is confined to determining whether there is substantial credible evidence to support this decision. Helehan v. Ueland (1986), [223 Mont. 288,] 725 P.2d 1192, 1194, 43 St.Rep. 1679, 1682. “In so determining, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.” Id. “Further, the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Porter v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1970
- Jensen v. JensenMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Norman v. CorbleyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re the Marriage of JensenMontana Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.