Medina v. Salinas

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

Appellant contests a take-nothing judgment in her suit involving an automobile collision. The jury found her 60% negligent. Appellant’s two points of error contest the court’s exclusion of evidence that appellee had no driver's license, and the denial of a new trial requested on grounds of the exclusion of that evidence. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

On appeal, appellant argues that the stipulated testimony of Salinas, “I do not have and have never had a driver’s license and would now be unable to get one,” should have been admitted because it was relevant to…