Phillips v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.
The offense is forgery; the punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions for a felony less than capital, life.
Trial was before a jury on a plea of not guilty. The punishment was assessed by the court.
Counsel appointed to represent appellant assisted him in the trial and filed his appellate brief though appellant insisted upon representing himself throughout the trial, examined and cross-examined the witnesses and made an argument to the jury.
Appellant’s brief complains that at the trial before the court on the issue of guilt or innocence, the court allowed the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Piraino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
3Cited by10 opinions
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Whittington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Fritz Whittington v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.