Legal Opinion

Brock v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 542 District 1

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-7631Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

KEARNEY, District Judge.

Union members claiming their union hiring hall’s policy allowing their union broth*434ers to directly solicit work from contractors constitutes race discrimination based on disparate impact must adduce facts supporting their suspicions. The union members cannot simply allege a hiring hall policy and lost hours without showing some causation or nexus between their alleged injury and the policy allowing all union members the opportunity to privately market their skills to contractors. Pleading a good faith complaint based on perception is much different than…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API