Legal Opinion

Mariner v. A.P. Concrete

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 24, 2008Published

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the entry of a provisional order that reinstates voluntarily paid benefits pending a ruling on a petition for review is an “order or award of compensation or compensation scheme” that (1) is governed by 39-A M.R.S. § 205(9)(B)(2) (2007), and (2) requires continued payments until the dispute resolution process had been completed, pursuant to section 205(9)(B)(2). We determine that such a provisional order is not governed by section 205(9)(B)(2).

[¶ 2] Specifically, A.P. Concrete appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guaranty Fund Management Services v. Workers' Compensation BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Russell v. RUSSELL'S APPLIANCE SERVICESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Farris v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  4. Valliere v. Workers' Compensation BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API