Legal Opinion

Sheller v. Seattle Title Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1922No. 16865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHovey, J.

—Appellant purchased from E. E. Higgs certain real property in Seattle upon which a building was situated. At the time of the purchase there was a mortgage upon the property for $2,500, made by Higgs in favor of the respondent. There was a clause in the mortgage by which the mortgagor agreed to maintain insurance upon the buildings in favor of the mortgagee in the sum of at least $3,000. At the time of purchase, there were policies of insurance upon the *141property of $4,500, the policies being held by the respondent. Appellant desired to have some additional insurance and, according to his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hart v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Rezac v. ZimaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Chaffee v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rowe v. Whatcom County Railway & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graddon v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Hassell v. Sterling Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Bates v. Northern Bond & Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hassell v. STERLING FED. S. & L. ASSN.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API