Legal Opinion

Walczak v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 9, 2003No. A02A2449PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldridge, Judge.

Following a bench trial on stipulated facts adduced at a hearing on a motion to suppress, the State Court of Fayette County found Robert Walczak guilty of driving under the influence of drugs — less safe driver, and failure to yield the right of way. Walczak appeals his conviction, challenging both the denial of his motion to suppress and the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for DUI — less safe driver. Because the trial court properly denied the motion to suppress and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, we affirm.

1. Walczak first claims…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. LevinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Morrissette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Coghlan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Dechant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Rivera v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API