Legal Opinion
Laurence G. Limsico v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1991No. 90-70395PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Chief Judge:
Limsico appeals from a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying him relief from deportation. He argues that the Board’s denial of asylum eligibility is not supported by substantial evidence. He also asserts that the Board abused its discretion in denying his motion to reopen. Indeed, he contends that the Board erred in deciding his motion to reopen before the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) stated its position on the motion. He further argues that the Board's refusal to suspend deportation violates the intent of Congress to keep families…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roberto Antonio Aguilera-Cota v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ErricoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilma Esperanza Estrada-Posadas v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jon Darrell StaufferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hurn Bu Roe v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Najmabadi v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shabanali Ladha Khatoon Ladha Farzana S. Ladha v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Anis Shokri Salama Malty v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Carlos Humberto Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Usha Bhasin v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.