Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dillon v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1950No. Civ. No. 17762Published

1DissentWhite, P. J.

I dissent. We are not here confronted with a situation wherein the superior court sought to dismiss an action properly filed with it because after such filing jurisdiction of the subject matter was by legislative action reposed in the municipal court. The action of the superior court in transferring the instant cause to the municipal court is not therefore, fraught with the dangers of the injustice pointed out in Architectural Tile Co. v. Superior Court, 108 Cal.App. 369, 371 [291 P. 586], and referred to in the majority opinion.

*440It seems to me elementary that if jurisdiction is the “authority…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berg v. TraegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. In Re CavittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Architectural Tile Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API