Legal Opinion

United States v. Arreola-Trasvina

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2006No. 04-50151Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Mario Humberto Arreola-Trasvina appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The Clerk shall file appellant’s supplement to the opening brief received on December 20, 2004. We reject Arreola-Trasvina’s contention that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the supervised release revocation proceeding because the underlying warrant was not supported by an oath. See United States v. Ortuno-Higareda, 450 F.3d 406, 410-11 (9th Cir-.2006) (holding that oath requirement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Lazaro Huerta-Pimental, AKA Jose HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. UNITED STATES v. RAUL ORTUÑO-HIGAREDACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API