Legal Opinion

Vickery v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided February 3, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-00731-CB-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

CHARLES R. BUTLER, JR., Senior District Judge.

This action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981, involves several employment discrimination claims based on “reverse” discrimination and retaliation. The defendant has filed a motion seeking summary judgment on all claims. (Doc. 45.) After due consideration of the motion, plaintiffs response, and all supporting evidence and briefs, the Court finds that the motion is due to be granted.

Facts

Background

Plaintiff Carl Vickery was employed by defendant Medtronic, Inc. from 2006 until 2012. Vickery has an associate’s degree in *1247nursing,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ghioroaie-Panait v. SpryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
  2. Mayes v. Birmingham City SchoolsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  3. Wineman v. Jacksonville, The City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  4. Zea v. City of NaplesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API