Legal Opinion
Maeberry v. HOUSING & REDEVELOP. AUTH. OF DULUTH, MINN.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 30, 1971No. 5-71 Civ. 65Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEVILLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff is a tenant in premises owned and managed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth,. Minnesota. July 1, 1971 by certified letter plaintiff was notified of a hearing to be held on Tuesday, July 20, 1971 in the offices of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The notice read in part as follows:
“The purpose of the hearing is to give you an opportunity to reply to the following charges:
1. Failure to pay charges required by your lease.
2. Threatening employees and tenants with bodily harm.
3. Physical damage caused to apartment.
You are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Escalera v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Jenswold v. St. Louis County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956