Legal Opinion
Schnitzler v. Casey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 21, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
A proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the New York City Transit Authority dismissing petitioner from his position as assistant foreman has been transferred to this court (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296). Petitioner was accused of having tampered with chewing gum vending machines at a subway station on a certain day, while away from his place of duty without permission. After a trial in the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, he was acquitted of a charge of petit larceny and possession of burglar’s tools. Thereafter, he was given a hearing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Cunningham v. BinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Berman v. GillroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Cohen v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harry Warren and Stephen Nanna v. Edward Byrne and John GuldiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Leogrande v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Combes v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Annunziata v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Scales v. MaxwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976