Legal Opinion

KAREEM v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 8, 2023No. 1:20-cv-07846Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE __________________________________ : HUSSAIN KAREEM, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil No. 20-7846 (RBK/MJS) v. : : OPINION PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et : al., : : Defendants. : __________________________________ KUGLER, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion” or “Mot.”) (ECF No. 97), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons set forth, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background On June 26,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API