Legal Opinion

In Re Toms

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1999No. 19-11341PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BRUCE I. FOX, Bankruptcy Judge.

The law firm of Koresko & Associates, P.C., filed an application for approval of counsel fees in the amount of $9,018.75 and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $306.27, based upon 11 U.S.C. § 330(a). The services rendered and costs incurred arose during the debtors’ chapter 13 case, prior to its conversion to chapter 7. The debtors have filed a timely objection thereto, arguing that the services rendered were unnecessary. 1 In addition to objecting to counsel’s application, the debtors seek relief under 11 U.S.C. § 329(b) contending that all…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In Re: John Fickling, Debtor. John Fickling, Debtor-Appellee v. Flower, Medalie & Markowitz, Esqs.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Great Road Service Center, Inc. v. Golden (In Re Great Road Service Center, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2004
  3. In re MohrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015
  4. In re GrassoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Willard v. O'Neil (In Re Willard)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API