Legal Opinion

Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Burlingham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1884PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court, dismissing an appeal to it from the District Court of Central Berkshire. The ground of dismissal relied on is that no bond for costs, &e. has been filed, as required by the St. of 1882, c. 95. Pub. Sts. c. 154, §52; c. 155, § 29. A bond was filed in the cause which, no doubt, was intended to satisfy the statutes; but it misdescribes the action in several particulars. Hewes v. Cooper, 115 Mass. 42, 44. The name of the plaintiff is recited as the Wheeler & Wilson Sewing Machine Company, instead of the Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Company,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wiser v. BlachlyNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. O'Loughlin v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Keene v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Hewes v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shea v. Neponset River Marine & Sportfishing, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Shour v. HeninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Krinsky v. Stevens Coal Sales Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Henderson v. BensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Folsom v. CornellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API