Legal Opinion
Reece v. Chestatee State Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 6, 2003No. A02A1957PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
Chestatee State Bank (the “Bank”) filed the underlying action against Terri and Woody Reece, alleging that the defendants defaulted on two promissory notes. Mr. and Mrs. Reece filed a counterclaim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court granted summary judgment to the Bank on both the breach of contract action and the counterclaim. Mr. and Mrs. Reece appeal, arguing that genuine issues of material fact remain. We disagree and affirm.
To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Association Services, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Northside Hospital, Inc. v. RuotanenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Carter v. Willowrun Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Munoz v. American Lawyer Media, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Lively v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Secured Realty Investment, Inc. v. Bank of North GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Smith v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- First Specialty Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Big Sandy Partnership, LLC v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.