Tully v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters1 statement of tbe case: The grounds of the motion sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPeelle, J.
Judgment was rendered in this case against the United States and the Apache Indians December 5, 1892, for $15,215 on an agreed stipulation under the provisions of section 4, Indian depredation act March 3, 1891 (26 Stat. L., 851).
On December 4,1894, the defendants filed their motion for a new trial under the provisions of Eevised Statutes, section 1088, setting forth that “ in the award of said judgment wrong and injustice was doné the United States in this, that—
u (1)' The record does not show and the evidence does not prove that Esteban Ochoa, the deceased partner of the claimant, was a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Kansas IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1894
- Graham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1895
- Carter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frank B. James v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Mashpee Tribe v. Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Mashpee Tribe v. Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.