Legal Opinion
Mercedes-Benz United States, LLC v. Carduco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 31, 2016No. NUMBER 13-13-00296-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez
This appeal arises from a judgment entered in favor of appellee Carduco, Inc.
*457d/b/a Cardenas Metroplex (Carduco) and against appellants Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC; Jack L. Holt, a Mercedes Regional Franchise Manager; Craig W. Dearing, a Mercedes After-Sales Operations Manager; and Frank J. Oswald Jr., a Mercedes After-Sales Operations Manager, (collectively "MBUSA") in a suit for fraud in the inducement and negligent misrepresentation. By nine issues, MBUSA contend: (1-2) the reliance element of Carduco's claims was not established as a matter of law…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Jack L. Holt, Craig W. Dearing and Frank J. Oswald, Jr. v. Carduco, Inc. D/B/A Cardenas MetroplexTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- Scurry v. Amegy Bank of TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025