Roberts v. State

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon a charge of engaging in and managing the business of a dealer in spirituous, vinous and malt liquors without a license, on the 8th day of March, 1890. Defendant moved in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, which motions were overruled, and defendant sentenced to pay a fine of six hundred dollars and costs of the case, and the case now comes before this court upon writ of error.

*361There are. but two assignments of error in the case: I. The Court erred in overruling motion in arrest of judgment ; 2. The Court erred in refusing to grant a new…