Legal Opinion
Gardner v. 4 U Technology, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 16, 2000No. 4:99-cv-01801Published
1Opinion of the Court
88 F.Supp.2d 1005 (2000)
William GARDNER, Plaintiff,
v.
4 U TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Missouri corporation, et al., Defendants.
No. 4:99-CV-1801 CAS.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.
March 16, 2000.
David M. Heimos, Heimos Law Office, Clayton, MO, for William K. Gardner, plaintiff.
Guang Ming Li, St. Louis, MO, for 4 U Technology, Inc., a Missouri corporation, defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHAW, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Shing-Yan (Edward) Kuo's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.[1] Plaintiff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hamm v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Morton v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Keith Gibb v. John Scott, Keith Gibb v. World Book, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.