People v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Introduction
Leonard J. Ross and Ronald Ross each appeal judgments of the Santa Clara County Superior Court, following their pleas of guilty to numerous felony counts. Both appellants contend: (1) the court had no authority to conduct a postplea Penal Code section 654 1 evidentiary hearing and all evidence produced at that hearing must be disregarded; (2) the court violated Penal Code section 654 when it sentenced them for numerous offenses.
The People also appeal, contending that the court erred in holding that section 654 precluded sentencing Leonard Ross for both the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Davis v. Dennis B.California Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. VenegasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- State v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.