Legal Opinion

United States v. Yount

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1920No. 4773PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Application by the United States for an order to remove George W. Yount and others to the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, to answer a charge of conspiracy to violate the Never Eood Control Act (Comp, St 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 3115%e-3115%kk, 3115%/-3115%r), as amended.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

This is an application by the United States attorney Jor an order to remove the defendants to the Northern district of Illinois, Eastern division, there to answer a charge of conspiracy preferred by indictment against the defendants and others. The defendants were arrested and brought before the United States commissioner of this district, and after hearing were committed, on their failure to give bail. Thereupon this application for removal was made to this court. The application is resisted strenuously by the defendants, each of them denying any complicity in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Kazuhisa AbeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
  2. Franchise Motor Freight Assn. v. SeaveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Burger v. Social Security BoardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946
  4. In re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1947
  5. In Re Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API