Legal Opinion

Magruder v. Marshall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

Judgment, execution, and replevin bond; the intestate replevin surety; scire facias against his administrator; plea to the scire facias, that the bond was given for ease and favour; replication to the plea; demurrer and joinder. The defence set up is, that the law authorizing replevin bonds is unconstitutional and void; and this is the only question we are called upon to decide;

Howie, for the plaintiff. Nelson, for the defendant.

Much has been said and written on this vexata quaestio, and much talent has been employed in its discussion, not only here but in some óf our sister states; and in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strong v. DanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Carlon v. DixonOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Lessey v. President of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API