Legal Opinion
Regenbogen v. Mustille
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 5, 1995No. 5:92-cv-01662PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
POOLER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants Anthony Mustille, C. Richard Orndoff and Richard C. Surles move for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff Adam Regenbogen’s claims of discrimination based on religion and national origin. These claims arise out of Regenbogen’s termination from his job as Director of Quality Assurance (“DQA”) at Willard Psychiatric Center (“Willard”), a mental hygiene facility within the New York State Office of Mental Hygiene (“OMH”). At the time of Regenbogen’s termination, Surles was the commissioner of OMH, Orndoff, the western…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cooper v. New York State Office of Mental HealthDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997