Legal Opinion
Doe v. Poritz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 22, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
283 N.J. Super. 372 (1995)
661 A.2d 1335
JOHN DOE, (A FICTITIOUS NAME) INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DEBORAH PORITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Burlington County.
Decided February 22, 1995.
Furlong and Krasny, for plaintiff John Doe (John S. Furlong, Esquire, appearing).
Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey for defendant (Deborah T. Poritz appearing and Madeleine W. Mansier, Esquire and Jane Grall, Esquire on the Brief).
Capehart and Scatchard, for the New Jersey Senate…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995