Legal Opinion
Doe v. Poritz
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 25, 1995Published
1Opinion of the Court
142 N.J. 1 (1995)
662 A.2d 367
JOHN DOE (A FICTITIOUS NAME), INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
DEBORAH PORITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 2, 1995.
Decided July 25, 1995.
John S. Furlong argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Furlong and Krasny, attorneys).
Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, argued the cause pro se (Ms. Poritz, attorney; Joseph L. Yannotti and Jane A. Grall, Assistant Attorneys…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited137 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.