Legal Opinion
Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fred M. Simmons, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 4, 1964No. 162PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Appellants have not properly challenged any of the findings of fact. The question for decision then is: Do the facts found suffice to support the judgment?
The policy issued by plaintiff is designated: “Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Policy.” It insures defendant Harris, an insulation contractor, for a term of one year from July 1, 1960. The “insuring agreements,” stated in the policy, read:
“COVERAGE A —BODILY INJURY LIABILITY
“To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury, sickness or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Sheehan v. GorianskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cowan v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Lisa Byrd Garrity, Administratrix of Estate of Judy Rice, and Freddie B. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Pulte Homes of New Mexico, Inc. v. Indiana Lumbermens Insurance Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009