Bucher v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the close of plaintiff's testimony on the trial of this action, the defendant's counsel moved for a nonsuit upon two grounds: First, that the evidence showed no negligence on the part of the defendant. Second, that the evidence showed negligence on the part of the plaintiff which contributed to the injury. The plaintiff's counsel asked to go to the jury upon these questions; this request was refused and the motion for a nonsuit granted, and an exception taken to the ruling by the plaintiff's counsel.
As the evidence stands there can be, we think, no serious question in regard to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- H.M. Filer v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Keating v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Salter v. . Utica Black River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
3Cited by12 opinions
- Montgomery & Eufaula Railroad v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. AthonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Mearns v. Central Railroad of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Dieckmann v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Jones v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.