Legal Opinion

Dieckmann v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 5, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — How. B. H. Miller, Judge. Action to recover damages -for the death of Frederick J. Dieckmann. There was a directed verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The following facts are undisputed: The defendant operates a double track railway, passing east and west through the town of De Witt, Iowa. The ticket office, waiting room, and main platform of the station are north of the tracks. Trains move eastward on the north track and westward on the south track, and westbound passengers are required to pass from the main platform over a planked way across both tracks to a platform on the south side in order to board their trains. At about, eleven o’clock of the night of March 31, 19.02, Frederick J. Dieckmann, a traveling saleman, went to the station…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Gaynor v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Ernst v. . Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Chunn v. City & Suburban R. Co. of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fagan v. . Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Crozier v. Hawkeye Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Landis v. Inter-Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Lundien v. Fort Dodge, Des Moines & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Ozark Air Lines, Inc. v. Robert C. LarimerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API