Legal Opinion

County of Alameda v. Mosier

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1984No. A018506PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that judgments for paternity or child support, entered as a result of an agreement between the district attorney and a parent not represented by an attorney, are voidable if the unrepresented parent can establish that he or she was not advised by the district attorney of the right to trial on the questions of paternity and ability to support and that he or she was unaware of such rights and would not otherwise have executed the agreement. Rodney Dean Mosier appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a stipulated judgment of paternity. We reverse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Salas v. CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Isbell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. DeHavilland Aircraft of Canada, Ltd. v. BetarSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. County of Sonoma v. IsbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. County of Ventura v. TillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Solberg v. WenkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. County of Los Angeles v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. County of Los Angeles v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API