Legal Opinion
Mitchell Family Planning Inc. v. City of Royal Oak
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 5, 1972No. Civ. A. 37227PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
This action was instituted on October 12, 1971, by an Order to Show Cause based on plaintiffs’ complaint praying that City Ordinance No. 71-10 of defendant City of Royal Oak be declared unconstitutional and that defendants be enjoined from enforcing that ordinance.
At the hearing held on October 18, 1971, pursuant to the above-mentioned order, counsel agreed that the facts involved were clear and undisputed; a stipulation of facts was filed on October 29, 1971.
Thereafter, only questions of law being involved, the matter was submitted on respective…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Muskegon Theatres, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. City of Muskegon, a Municipal Corporation, and the Amazon Company, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- DeFilippo v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- DeFilippo v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.