Legal Opinion
Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co., Inc. v. United States of America for the Use of Tayler Products Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 27, 1965No. 19843_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
In this Miller Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d) case, the general contractor appeals from a summary judgment granted by the District Court in favor of a material supplier to a subcontractor.
There was no genuine issue with respect to the material facts on the showing made at the District Court hearing. Appellants’ fairly feeble opposition to the motion in the District Court has not been much strengthened on appeal. The general contractor now cites United States for Benefit and Use of Westinghouse Supply Co. v. Robbins (1954 D.C.Mass.), 125 F.Supp. 25, for the proposition that the material…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company, Inc. v. Allsop Lumber Company, Inc., Allsop Lumber Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- A. Belanger & Sons, Inc. v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of National U. S. Radiator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- Fourt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. RobbinsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- United States Ex Rel. National U. S. Radiator Corp. v. D. C. Loveys Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Chemetron Corp. v. George A. Fuller Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1966
- Solite Masonry Units Corp. v. Piland Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972