Legal Opinion
United States v. Robbins
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 20, 1954No. Civ. A. 53-829PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
This is an action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq., to recover the price of certain materials allegedly furnished by the use plaintiff, Westinghouse Electric Supply Company (hereinafter called Westinghouse), for use in connection with work done at the Water-town Arsenal under a contract No. DA-19-066-Ord-1431 between the United States and defendant Dale Construction Co. (hereinafter called Dale). It is alleged that these materials were used, consumed and incorporated into the work done in connection with the execution of this contract. Defendant Phoenix…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States Ex Rel. American Radiator & Sanitary Corp. v. Northwestern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- United States Ex Rel. Bruce Co. v. Fraser Const. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
- United States Ex Rel. Hargis v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
- United States Ex Rel. John A. Denie's Sons Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States of America for the Use and Benefit of J. P. Byrne & Co., Inc. v. Fire Association of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- United States Ex Rel. Color Craft Corp. v. DicksteinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1957
- National Surety Corporation v. The United States of America for the Use of Way Panama, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Apache Powder Co. v. Ashton Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Circle Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.