THC Financial Corp. v. Managed Investment Corp.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, J.
In this case, we need to determine whether the usury laws of Hawaii were violated in regard to three loan agreements between plaintiff-appellee THC Financial Corporation and defendants-appellants Managed Investment Corporation, Durrel L. Robison and Jeanne B. Robison.
Plaintiff filed a complaint in the circuit court for collection of principal and interest due on these promissory notes 1 and for the foreclosure of the real estate securing these notes. The court later found the notes to be in default, and entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law in which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Perlman v. First National Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Cochran v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- O'Brien v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Cagle v. Boyle Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawler v. Lomas & Nettleton Mortgage InvestorsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Lawler v. Lomas & Nettleton Mortgage InvestorsTexas Supreme Court · 1985