Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. English

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1898No. Nos. 11,126-(199)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by John Fitzgerald, as administrator of tbe estate of David O’Neil, deceased, from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Willis, J., denying his motion for a new trial, after finding that the claim of Thomas English was a valid claim against said estate.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

David O’Neil was a resident of St. Paul, in this state, and on July 27, 1895, died intestate. Letters of administration were issued on his estate, and, pursuant to notice to creditors to file claims, the respondent, English, filed a claim which was allowed by the probate court. The administrator appealed to the district court from the allowance. The district court also allowed the claim, and from an order of that court denying a new trial the administrator appeals to this court.

English presented the claim as assignee of Michael O’Neil, the brother of the deceased. Michael O’Neil resided at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cover v. StemCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  2. Conrad v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Lydiard v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. P. P. Mast & Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lundgren v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Meyer v. StortenbeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. In re the Estate of AlmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Bayne v. Greiner's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Brunetti v. Duluth & Iron Range RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API