Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Akers

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided August 30, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00590Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION BRENT CLIFTON BARNARD, § Plaintiff, § § v. § A-23-CV-590-DII § TRAVIS AKERS and OLIVIA § ESPINOZA, § Defendants. § ORDER Before the Court are Brent Clifton Barnard’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint and associated pleadings, and Defendants Olivia Espinoza and Travis Akers’s Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 46, 51). Barnard is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Upon review of the parties’ arguments and pleadings, the Court grants Defendants Espinoza and Akers’s Motions for Summary Judgment. I. Procedural…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API