Legal Opinion
Exxonmobil Gas & Power Marketing Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 21, 2011No. 10-1098Published
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the briefs of the parties, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed.
After its facilities were damaged by Hurricane Ike, Sea Robin Pipeline Company sought to amend its natural gas transportation rates by implementing a “Hurricane Surcharge” through a limited filing under Natural Gas Act (NGA) Section 4, 15 U.S.C. § 717c(d), with FERC. Petitioners ExxonMobil Gas & Power Marketing Company and Hess Corporation (collectively, “Shippers”) protested the surcharge. FERC accepted Sea Robin’s…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Fourth Branch Associates (Mechanicville) v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010