Legal Opinion

Ronan v. Barr

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 8, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing. On bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Backus, Y. C.

This is a biil to enforce an implied restrictive covenant upon lands. The case made by the bill is: On August 3d, 1907, the Metuchen Building Company acquired the fee to lots Nos. 3, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, part of 4 and 5; a part of lots Nos. 16 (and 17), and lots Nos. 7,11,12, 13,14 (15), 18, 19, 20, 21 and 32 of a plot entitled “A map of 32 lots belonging to the estate of E. S. Peck, situate at Metuchen, New Jersey.” In order to sell the lots and induce persons to buy, the company adopted a general plan and uniform scheme for their development, which included that each lot should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Underwood v. Herman & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. O'Hara v. NelsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Priory v. Borough of ManasquanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Ritter v. Jersey City Dist. Missionary Soc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  3. Wilson v. Ocean Terrace Garden Apartments, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  4. Stone v. Avalon Ice & Cold Storage Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API