Fiduccia v. SUMMIT HILL CONST. CO., INC.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
109 N.J. Super. 249 (1970)
262 A.2d 920
PETER FIDUCCIA AND BARBARA FIDUCCIA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SUMMIT HILL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY AND THE BOROUGH OF ROSELAND, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, District Court Essex County.
Decided March 4, 1970.
Mr. Francis W. Donahue appeared for plaintiffs (Messrs. Rubin, Dolgoff & Sussman, attorneys).
Mr. Norman A. Doyle appeared for defendants (Mr. Thomas E. Durkin, attorney).
YANOFF, J.D.C.
The problem raised on this motion to dismiss count II of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Caputzal v. Lindsay Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Amelchenko v. Borough of FreeholdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Hoy v. CapelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Benson v. KutschWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Cancel v. WatsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Geringer v. Hartz Mountain Development CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.