Legal Opinion

People v. Rahbari

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2014No. A139464PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION†]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.

Appellant Manuchehr Rahbari was convicted of passing checks with insufficient funds. He was sentenced, pursuant to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (h) (section 1170(h)), 1 to a term in county jail followed by mandatory supervision. The trial court also ordered appellant to pay restitution to certain victims. In the published portion of our opinion, we conclude that the scope of a victim restitution order issued in connection with a sentence pursuant to section 1170(h) is limited to those losses caused by the crime or crimes of which the defendant was convicted. In the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. FandinolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. GhebretensaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  4. People v. Amaya CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API