Freitag v. Burke
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.
This was an action on a promissory note executed by the appellant to the appellee. The defendant, Freitag, pleaded:.
1. The general denial.
2. Payment.
3. No consideration for the note.
4. That the defendant before that time had contracted to build a house for one Seitz, for which building Burke had furnished materials for the foundation; that the defendant had executed the note therefor under a misapprehension that he was bound to pay for the same ; but that defendant afterward brought suit against Seitz to recover the amount due for the erection of said house, in which suit it was decreed that…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FentonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- City of Evansville v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Miller v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Brown v. SearleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885