Legal Opinion

Freitag v. Burke

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

This was an action on a promissory note executed by the appellant to the appellee. The defendant, Freitag, pleaded:.

1. The general denial.

2. Payment.

3. No consideration for the note.

4. That the defendant before that time had contracted to build a house for one Seitz, for which building Burke had furnished materials for the foundation; that the defendant had executed the note therefor under a misapprehension that he was bound to pay for the same ; but that defendant afterward brought suit against Seitz to recover the amount due for the erection of said house, in which suit it was decreed that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FentonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. City of Evansville v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Miller v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Brown v. SearleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API