Legal Opinion

State v. Wolf

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 31, 2006No. 56179-1-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 Evidence for a criminal conviction is sufficient where “after viewing the evidence most favorable to *197the State, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of [the crime] beyond a reasonable doubt.”1 The State has this burden to prove a criminal charge.2 But a defendant may waive this proof requirement to the extent that he or she stipulates to an element of a charged crime.3 Here, the charge was that Gary Wolf was a felon in possession of a firearm. He stipulated to a necessary element of that charge: having been convicted of a prior serious offense. He did so in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  4. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API