State v. Wolf
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 Evidence for a criminal conviction is sufficient where “after viewing the evidence most favorable to *197the State, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of [the crime] beyond a reasonable doubt.”1 The State has this burden to prove a criminal charge.2 But a defendant may waive this proof requirement to the extent that he or she stipulates to an element of a charged crime.3 Here, the charge was that Gary Wolf was a felon in possession of a firearm. He stipulated to a necessary element of that charge: having been convicted of a prior serious offense. He did so in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.