Legal Opinion
State v. Wolf
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 31, 2006No. 56179-1-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 P.3d 414 (2006)
134 Wash.App. 196
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Gary E. WOLF, a.k.a. Gary E. Spencer, Appellant.
No. 56179-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
July 31, 2006.
Oliver Davis, Seattle, for Appellant.
Scott F. Leist, King County Pros. Atty., Seattle, for Respondent.
PUBLISHED IN PART
COX, J.
¶ 1 Evidence for a criminal conviction is sufficient where "after viewing the evidence most favorable to the State, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of [the crime] beyond a reasonable doubt."[1] The State has this burden to prove a criminal…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- In re the Involuntary Treatment of: B.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.