Legal Opinion

City Court of Pea Ridge v. Tiner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 26, 1987No. 86-267PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

Albert Tiner was charged in the City Court of Pea Ridge under state law for driving while intoxicated. The city court refused his motion for a change of venue to Rogers Municipal Court. Tiner subsequently petitioned the Benton County Circuit Court for a writ of prohibition to prevent the city court from proceeding. The circuit court granted the writ and ordered a change of venue. The city court appeals from that order.

We agree with the trial court and affirm. In Russell v. Miller, 253 Ark. 583, 487 S.W.2d 617 (1972), we analyzed similar issues in light of Ark.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beaumont v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Russell v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sexson v. Municipal CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990
  5. Sexson v. Municipal CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API