City Court of Pea Ridge v. Tiner
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
Albert Tiner was charged in the City Court of Pea Ridge under state law for driving while intoxicated. The city court refused his motion for a change of venue to Rogers Municipal Court. Tiner subsequently petitioned the Benton County Circuit Court for a writ of prohibition to prevent the city court from proceeding. The circuit court granted the writ and ordered a change of venue. The city court appeals from that order.
We agree with the trial court and affirm. In Russell v. Miller, 253 Ark. 583, 487 S.W.2d 617 (1972), we analyzed similar issues in light of Ark.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Beaumont v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Russell v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sexson v. Municipal CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990
- Sexson v. Municipal CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993