Legal Opinion
Doe v. Mamsi Life and Health Ins. Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 25, 2007No. Civil Action 05-2450 (ESH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff has brought suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., challenging the denial of claims for health care benefits for inpatient and outpatient treatment of bulimia nervosa under a private employer-sponsored group welfare benefit plan. The parties agree that the plan is governed by ERISA, and that defendant MAMSI Life and Health Insurance Company (“MAMSI”) administers the plan under which plaintiff received health benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(16)(A). (Def. Facts ¶¶ 1-3; Def. Mot. at 1;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Caldwell v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Communications Workers of America Lyle Wingate v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company American Telephone and Telegraph Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Ralph Block v. Pitney Bowes Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marcin v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- James v. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Foster v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Chipman v. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Ferreyra v. Fraternal Order of Police Legal Plan, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.