Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Carrico

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 18, 1998No. Record 972272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

As relevant to this appeal, Code § 8.01-380(A) provides that a party shall not be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit “unless he does so before a motion to strike the evidence has been sustained or before the jury retires from the bar or before the action has been submitted to the court for decision.” In this case, we consider whether the trial court’s order granting a motion for nonsuit on the basis that the action had not been submitted to the court for decision is erroneous.

Delores Carrico filed a motion for judgment against Roger Lee Kelly. Carrico, who had nonsuited a prior action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wells v. Lorcom House Condominiums' Council of Co-OwnersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  3. City of Hopewell v. CogarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Khanna v. DOMINION BANK OF N. VA., NASupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Transcontinental Insurance v. RBMW, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS, INC. v. CostonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Min Kyu Sue v. Sung Hoon ParkFairfax County Circuit Court · 2005
  4. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors v. Zoning Appeals BoardFairfax County Circuit Court · 2006
  5. Johnson v. Norfolk Portsmouth Belt Line RailroadPortsmouth County Circuit Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API